Saturday, April 4, 2009
Libertas smear on Cohn-Bendit after Declan Ganley loses debate
In a typically dishonest Libertas move they have edited a three min clip of sound-bites from a 90 debate that present only Declan Ganley speaking. This is typical Libertas. i
Libertas.eu has just a three min link to the Youtube edit. It would also appear that Libertas are suggesting the Bendit is a paedophile
http://libertas.eu/en/news/186-cohn-bendits-attempt-at-libertas-smear-backfires-as-his-murky-past-is-revealed
Funny that Cohn-Bendit links to the full debate while Ganley and Libertas hide their failure with a 3 minute selection of carefully edit Transparency? Openness?
Libertas style.
Daniel Cohn-Bendit vs Declan Ganley: "The big debate" in the Renaissance Hotel in Brussels
One of the highlights is ganley attempting to get out of his association with Cyprian Gutkowski the deputy chief of All-Polish Youth who believes that Jews are biologically different. When ganley tried to say who? Cohn-Bendit was able to point to the sick Pole who was in the audience
Say No to Ganley
Say Yes to Freedom
Say No To Libertas
Say No to the Big Lie
The All Polish Youth and the League of Polish families doe snot confine itself to hatred of the jews they also hate gays and gypsies.
No to Zyklon B No return Auswittz death camps
Now, I don't know if you managed to get through that mess, but in it "Peoplekorps" alleges that Dany Cohn-Bendit points to Cyprian Gutkowski in the audience. Far be it for me to speak on Mr. Gutkowski's nehalf but I will go as far as saying this... Cyprian Gutkowski wasn't there. The man in the audience is Maciej Giertych a Polish MEP. Perhaps his mistake was watching it after his nurse administered his antipsychotic drugs.
Also, Peoplekorps, it's"Auschwitz".
And from the looks of the comments about a number of Polish people made in that blog I've got
to ask, is peoplekorps a racist?
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteDeclan Ganley announced last night that he will not contest a second Lisbon referendum if he fails be elected to the European parliament in June.
ReplyDeleteFor several months this blogger has sought an interview with Mr Ganley to discuss his less than transparent and entirely dubious private affairs and connections. Though the initial Declan Ganley announced last night that he will not contest a second Lisbon referendum if he fails be elected to the European parliament in June.
For several months this blogger has sought an interview with Mr Ganley to discuss his less than transparent and entirely dubious private affairs and connections. Though the initial response from Libertas's Anita Kelly was that Mr. Ganley was considering my request, Libertas stopped responding to my emails and I deemed the request denied .
Yesterday at 03:44 am I sent an outline of some very serious allegations that I stated I would publish at noon on 8 April but I stated I wished Mr. Ganley would respond before I published them and that I wished to afford him a right of reply. At 09.36 am on the 8 April Peoplekorps@gmail.com received a response from Libertas stating
"Declan Ganley has agreed to a talk with you, face to face. Agree?
Can you send me a contact number to arrange a time? I'll be out of the office for a while and will have patchy internet service.
".
I responded elaborating the terms that I would be willing to engage in such an interview and as yet have received no response from Libertas Eu.
Later on the same evening, 8 April 2009, Mr. Ganley stated that he would not contest a Lisbon II referendum if he did not win a seat in the parliamnet in June.
According to an eyewitness who posted on Politics.ie http://www.politics.ie/lisbon-treaty/59405-ganley-will-not-fight-lisbon-2-if-he-fails-euro-seat-bid-examiner.html#post1553738"
He said it this evening at an event in the Davenport Hotel.
During the course of the event he also levied a serious allegation at Dick Roche at which point shouts of hearsay where pointed at him from the audience. He basically said that over dinner in the Four Seasons a member of the Czech Government told him that it was Irish Government policy to try and isolate Ireland as much as possible within Europe. When a member of the audience asked him to substantiate this comment (under for instance, a freedom of information request) he retorted "the truth hurts" at which point he really lost the audience. Eventually he even said perhaps Dick Roche wasn't there and he was just going on what the Czech's told him....
Later in response to a journalist's question he stated he would not run if he were not elected as an MEP. According to political pundits in Ireland it is very unlikely that Mr. Ganley can win the seat he is contesting in the North West constituency.
I wonder are these matters connected?
Libertas Nein Danke author People Korps has received no clarification from Libertas spokesperson Anita Kelly that his conditions for an in depth interview will be agreed to by Mr. Ganley. In light of these developments I have forwarded the substance and basis of my revelations to several journalists in the mainstream media and I will leave in their hands to pursue this story for the moment and in the public interest.
Email peoplekorps@gmail.com and please provide full details and telephone numbers and email addresses of your news organisations if you wish to have further information with view to further enquiries.
On a personal basis I hope that Mr. Ganley will withdraw from political life forthwith.
email peoplekorps@gmail.com
People Korps the blogger 9 April 2009 4.49 am
ganley's polish pals LPF and All Polish Youth homophobia and neo nazi links
ReplyDeleteHRW Letter to Polish President Lech Kaczynski
February 14, 2006
On behalf of Human Rights Watch, I write in concern over a climate that increasingly threatens the basic rights and equality of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender people in Poland.
As you are undoubtedly aware, on January 18 the European Parliament overwhelmingly passed a resolution condemning “a series of worrying events” in member states, “ranging from banning gay pride or equality marches to the use by leading politicians and religious leaders of inflammatory or threatening language or hate speech, failure by police to provide adequate protection or even breaking up peaceful demonstrations,” as well as “violent demonstrations by homophobic groups.”
The European Parliament urged member states “firmly to condemn homophobic hate speech or incitement to hatred and violence, and to ensure that freedom of demonstration—guaranteed by all human rights treaties—is respected in practice.” It also called on them “to promote and implement the principle of equality in their societies and legal systems.”
Human Rights Watch urges that Poland, as an E.U. member state, through its government and you as President, respond positively, promptly and effectively to this resolution.
This resolution is based on human rights standards to which all European Union member states are bound, including Article 13 of the Amsterdam Treaty, Article 21 of the E.U. Charter of Fundamental Rights, and Directives 2000/43/EC and Directive 2000/78/EC prohibiting direct or indirect discrimination on specific grounds including sexual orientation. It is also based on Poland’s international legal obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
As president of Poland it is your responsibility to speak in defense of the rights freedoms of all Polish citizens, particularly vulnerable minorities. When government officials contribute actively to stigma against a minority that they are obligated to protect, they signal that discrimination and perhaps even violence will be tolerated. Such statements create a dangerous environment for the freedoms of all..
Human Rights Watch has been monitoring with grave reservations several restrictions placed on the rights of the lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender community in Poland over the past number of years. We are aware that you yourself have supported restrictions on that minority’s rights in your prior capacity as mayor of Warsaw, as have members of your party and government in public statements.
In 2004 and 2005, as mayor of Warsaw, you banned Gay Pride marches—a peaceful exercise of the freedom of assembly which had taken place several times in previous years without incident. You declared that you were opposed to “propagating gay orientation.” In 2004, you refused even to meet with the organizing group, the Campaign Against Homophobia—reportedly stating, "I am not willing to meet perverts." On the other hand you approved counter-demonstrations by conservative groups opposed to the march, the League of Polish Families and the All-Polish Youth. In the same year, a “March for Tolerance” organized by the Campaign Against Homophobia in Cracow was attacked by over two hundred demonstrators, many skinheads from the All-Polish Youth, who pelted them with eggs, bottles, and rocks, and shouted "Send the fags to the hospital!" and "Perverts, get out of Cracow!"
In 2005, more than two thousand demonstrators, supported by the deputy prime minister and deputy speaker of the Sejm, defied your ban and marched through Warsaw’s streets, despite attacks from counterdemonstrators. Counterdemonstrators threw eggs and rushed barricades in an attempt to beat marchers. You subsequently condemned the fact that police did not stop the march, but that they tried to stop the attackers. Your official position was that “the police undertook to protect an illegal demonstration by gay and lesbian organizations but drastically attacked other illegal gatherings. This situation constitutes an infringement of the principles of social coexistence.”
Also in 2005, following the example of Warsaw, the mayor of Poznan banned a March for Equality and Tolerance in Poznan—one sponsored not only by the Campaign Against Homophobia but by human rights, women’s, and student organizations. When a small number of marchers persisted in assembling, members of the All-Polish Youth assaulted them, throwing projectiles and shouting “Gas the fags!” and “We’ll do to you what Hitler did to the Jews!” In this case, police intervened against the marchers rather than the attackers, arresting sixty-eight of them.
Since you assumed the presidency, your political allies have continued to make ominous statements threatening state action against the public expression or defense of homosexuality. Prime Minister Kasimierz Marcinkiewicz has told the press that if a homosexual “tries to 'infect' others with their homosexuality, then the state must intervene in this violation of freedom.” Jaroslaw Kaczynski, leader of the Law and Justice Party, and your brother, called during the 2005 election campaign for banning gays and lesbians from teaching. In January 2006, he condemned a situation where “gay people are allowed to conduct perverse demonstrations in the streets, but it is forbidden to discuss the issue of moral censorship.”
We are also concerned by the election by the Sejm, on January 26, of Janusz Kochanowski as Ombudsman for Human Rights. Mr. Kochanowski has stated in the past that "a culture favorable to pedophilia has come to Poland. … This culture already accepts homosexuality and wants it to be seen as equal to heterosexuality. And there is a link between pedophilia and homosexuality: the majority of pedophiles are homosexual."
That statement is untrue. Further, the mentality it reflects--one in which myth and stigma are used to vilify a minority and nullify its right to participate in society--is inimical to Poland’s vibrant democracy. Fears of “infection” and blatant invocations of prejudice cannot be allowed to decide how citizens exercise their rights. Gays and lesbians marching in the streets pose no conceivable threat to other Poles. To suppress their freedoms threatens all people’s equality.
Poland is a long standing party to the European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. You will thus be aware that Poland is bound to prohibit discrimination on grounds of sexual orientation or gender identity in relation to any of the rights enjoyed under the Convention. The European Court has on several occasions made clear that discrimination based on sexual orientation is strictly prohibited. Most recently in Karner v Austria, the Court pointed out that “very weighty reasons have to be put forward before the Court could regard a difference in treatment based exclusively on the ground of sex as compatible with the Convention. Just like differences based on sex, differences based on sexual orientation require particularly serious reasons by way of justification.” Similarly, the U.N. Human Rights Committee—charged with monitoring states’ compliance with the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) –held in 1994 in Toonen v Australia that sexual orientation should be understood as a status protected against discrimination by the treaty’s equality provisions.
Human Rights Watch is deeply concerned that actions that taken against lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender people in Poland directly violate these international standards. We therefore urge you to affirm that the rights to expression, association, and assembly cannot be denied on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity.
In your new capacity as Poland’s president, you stand under the scrutiny of Europe and the international community to see whether you will work to defend or seek to deny human rights protections. With confidence in the power and permanence of Poland’s democratic development, we hope that you will commit yourself to the former.
Sincerely,
Scott Long
Director
Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Rights Program
Human Rights Watch
How To Make money with affiliate programs Today. Affiliate marketing is the easier and probably the most effective method to make money from the internet. It is basically, a kind of selling technique where potential buyers from your website are directed to the websites of sellers. For every click, the website owner gets a small commission.
ReplyDeletewww.onlineuniversalwork.com